Digitalization and the degradation of parental authority among Generation Z in Kampung Timor, Ambon City

Authors

  • Paulus Koritelu Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Jeffry Ernest Marten Leiwakabessy Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • William Bernadus Titing Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Suleman Watianan Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61126/dtcs.v4i1.135

Keywords:

digitalization, parental authority, Generation Z, family relations, digital literacy

Abstract

This study examines the impact of digitalization on changing power relations within families, focusing on the erosion of parental authority among Generation Z in Kampung Timor, Ambon City. The rapid expansion of the internet, social media, and digital technologies has transformed patterns of family interaction while reshaping the values and behaviors of young people. A qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving both parents and children. The findings reveal that digital spaces have shifted sources of authority from parents to external actors, including social media platforms, influencers, and online communities. As a result, parental control has weakened, interpersonal communication has diminished, and traditional parenting practices have become less effective. The digital literacy gap between parents and children further reinforces young people's dominant position in accessing, interpreting, and producing information. These findings highlight the need to adapt parenting practices by strengthening parents’ digital literacy, fostering dialogical communication, and reinforcing family values. Such efforts are essential to sustaining parental authority while promoting healthy parent–child relationships in an increasingly digital society.

References

Alfaruqy, M. Z. (2022). Generasi Z dan nilai-nilai yang dipersepsikan dari orangtuanya. PSYCHE: Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung, 4(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v4i1.658

Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. SAGE.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Anchor Books.

Boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). Blackwell.

Chandler, D. (1995, September 18). Technological or media determinism. https://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/tecdet/

Davis, K. (1949). Human society. Macmillan.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Polity Press.

Gollmid, H. (2008). Technological change and social structure. Techne Press.

Hernandez, J. M., Ben-Joseph, E. P., Reich, S., Charmaraman, L., et al. (2024). Parental monitoring of early adolescent social technology use in the US: A mixed-method study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 33(3), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02734-6

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.

Islam, A. F., Nurwahidin, & Al-Asyhar, T. (2019). Self-concept of Generation Z in parenting and religiosity of parents in urban society: Qualitative approach in Dai family. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Strategic and Global Studies (ICSGS 2018) (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 338, pp. 15–20). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsgs-18.2019.3

Kadir, H. (2019). Ambon di bawah Orde Baru: Transformasi kapitalisme pada masyarakat pinggiran. Dialektika: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Ilmu Sosial, 12(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.33477/dj.v12i2.1115

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia, & UNICEF Indonesia. (2014). Studi nasional perilaku anak dan remaja dalam menggunakan internet di Indonesia.

Kusumalestari, R. R., Palapah, M. A. O., Ahmadi, D., Umar, M., & Yulianita, N. (2023). Parenting styles and digital literacy: Uncovering their correlation among adolescents. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 11(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v11i2.46658

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives. Oxford University Press.

Lister, M., et al. (2009). New media: A critical introduction. Routledge.

Maulidina, A., & Puspitawati, H. (2021). Gender analysis of family traditions, parent-child ties, and happiness in Generation Z during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Sciences, 6(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.v6i2.37325

Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Coyne, S. M. (2011). Technology and the family: An overview of theory and research. Marriage & Family Review, 47(8), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2011.619199

Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Free Press.

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563.n2

Steeves, V. (2014). Young Canadians in a wired world, phase III: Life online. MediaSmarts.

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x

Yılmaz, Y., Artan, T., Gurbanova, F., & Aliyeva, N. (2025). From the nest to the world: Helicopter parenting and challenges in young adult social integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1432859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1432859

Zahra, F., & Wulandari, P. (2022). Dysfunction of family roles for Generation Z. Journal of Development and Social Change, 5(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.20961/jodasc.v5i2.61586

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19

How to Cite

Koritelu, P., Leiwakabessy, J. E. M., Titing, W. B., & Watianan, S. (2026). Digitalization and the degradation of parental authority among Generation Z in Kampung Timor, Ambon City. Digital Theory, Culture & Society, 4(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.61126/dtcs.v4i1.135

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.