Hidden exploitation of women’s care work in Indonesia’s gig economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61126/dtcs.v4i1.143Keywords:
gig economy, care work, invisible gendered labor, digital economy, hidden exploitationAbstract
The rapid expansion of Indonesia’s digital economy has positioned the gig economy as a pathway for women’s economic inclusion through flexible, home-based digital work. However, this narrative often obscures the structural inequalities embedded in platform-based labor systems. This study examines how women’s digital labor intersects with unpaid care work to produce invisible, gendered forms of exploitation. Employing a qualitative case study approach, the research was conducted in the Greater Malang area of Indonesia and involved 15 women engaged in online selling, affiliate marketing, and content creation. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, limited observation, and digital documentation, and analyzed using thematic analysis informed by intersectionality and social reproduction perspectives. The findings reveal that women simultaneously perform domestic, digital, and emotional labor within blurred temporal boundaries. Rather than providing genuine flexibility, the gig economy operates through pseudo-flexibility characterized by algorithmic control, unstable income an always-on work culture, and limited social protection. Women’s digital labor remains socially undervalued, reinforcing unequal household power relations and perpetuating the invisibility of gendered labor. The study argues that the gig economy functions as a regime of invisible gendered labor in which technological infrastructures and patriarchal social structures mutually reproduce inequality through subtle yet exploitative mechanisms.
References
Acs, Z. J., Song, A. K., Szerb, L., Audretsch, D. B., & Komlósi, É. (2021). The evolution of the global digital platform economy: 1971–2021. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1629–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00561-x
Arcy, J. (2016). Emotion work: Considering gender in digital labor. Feminist Media Studies, 16(2), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Kepadatan penduduk menurut provinsi (jiwa/km2). 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTQxIzI=/kepadatan-penduduk-menurut-provinsi--jiwa-km2-.html
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
Crenshaw, K. (2021). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Droit et Société, 108, 465. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5
Crenshaw, K. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203060902-12
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529629866
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152153
Elson, D. (1999). Labor markets as gendered institutions: Equality, efficiency and empowerment issues. World Development, 27(3), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00147-8
Federici, S. (2020). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. PM Press. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375918.ch162
Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.64590/nt2
Gawer, A., & Srnicek, N. (2021). Online platforms: Economic and societal effects. European Parliament.
Glucksmann, M. (2016). Completing and complementing: The work of consumers in the division of labour. Sociology, 50(5), 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516649553
Gregory, K., & Sadowski, J. (2021). Biopolitical platforms: The perverse virtues of digital labour. Journal of Cultural Economy, 14(6), 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1901766
Hochschild, A. R. (2015). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In D. Engster & T. Med (Eds.), Justice, politics, and the family (pp. 249–261). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633794-21
Hunt, A., & Samman, E. (2019). Gender and the gig economy: Critical steps for evidence-based policy (Working Paper 546). Overseas Development Institute.
Hunt, A., & Samman, E. (2019). Gender and the gig economy: Critical steps for evidence-based policy (Working Paper 546). Overseas Development Institute. https://odi.org/en/publications/gender-and-the-gig-economy-critical-steps-for-evidence-based-policy/
International Labour Organization. (2018). Care jobs for the future of decent work. International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.54394/epno2524
International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. International Labour Organisation. https://doi.org/10.1002/wow3.170
Kabeer, N. (1999a). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
Kabeer, N. (1999b). The conditions and consequences of choice: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment (Vol. 108). Unrisd Geneva. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135166-9
Kasliwal, R. (2020). Gender and the gig economy: A qualitative study of gig platforms for women workers. ORF Issue Brief, 359, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.64178
Legislative Council. (2023). Development of cross-border e-commerce among ASEAN member countries. Legislative Council Secretariat.
Neha, K. (2025). The digital revolution and women's empowerment: Opportunities, challenges, and future prospects. The Research Dialogue, 3(4), 93–103.
Razavi, S. (2015). Care and social reproduction: Some reflections on concepts, policies and politics from a development perspective. In R. Baksh & W. Harcourt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of transnational feminist movements (pp. 423–445). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943494.013.031
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1976.4401305
Tayibnapis, A. Z., Wuryaningsih, L. E., & Gora, R. (2018). The development of digital economy in Indonesia. IJMBS International Journal of Management and Business Studies, 8(3), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.24123/soshum.v2i2.4430
UN Women. (2022). Facts and figures: Ending violence against women. New York. https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9824-0090
UNCTAD. (2021). Digital economy report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development for whom the data flow. UN. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210058254
Uula, M. M., & Surbakti, H. (2023). Digital economics in Indonesia: Development and research trend. Digital Economics Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.58968/der.v1i1.473
Wang, J., & Tomassetti, J. (2024). Labor-capital relations on digital platforms: Organization, algorithmic discipline and the social factory again. Sociology Compass, 18(3), e13192. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13192
Williams, C. C., & Nadin, S. (2012). Work beyond employment: Representations of informal economic activities. Work, Employment and Society, 26(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012437006
UN Women. (2020). Gender equality: Women's rights in review 25 years after Beijing. https://doi.org/10.18356/90ff6c86-en
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
World Bank. (2022a). World development report 2022: Finance for an equitable recovery. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1730-4
World Bank. (2022b). World development report 2022. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1730-4
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920118.n2
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syamsu Budyanti, Surokim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
