Scroll, watch, react: Perceived information through multimodality in sludge content on Instagram reels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61126/dtcs.v3i1.109Keywords:
multimodality, digital, perceived information, sludge content, Instagram reelsAbstract
The presence of multimodal culture on social media platforms, primarily on Instagram Reels ground, is composed of disputable perceived information, where comprehended information cannot be instantly sought as a sole interpretation. In the approach of the multimodality concept and engaging in the combination of visual, text, and auditory analyses, which compares plenty of relevant algorithm content, the present research examines the presence of sludge content as one of the various social media content ideas. This paper proposes to define sludge content or split screen video multimodality characters as a mass media technique, particularly on Instagram reels for starring in education, marketing, and entertainment, and how they impact the perceived messages. It discusses whether the presented frames contribute to each other's connections and intentions in constructing the same services. The analysis of the valuation implies that in circumstances where there are multimodal elements in the videos, the two screens intend to serve each other purposes not necessarily the same meaning, but instead support each other with disparate roles in constructing one delivery. The study contends that the appearance of sludge content is not meant to be conceived in only one way. Instead, different individuals might perceive a different sense of understanding, which leads to a varied interpretation or potential misunderstanding.
References
Abidin, C. (2021). From “networked publics” to “refracted publics”: A companion framework for researching “below the radar” studies. Social Media + Society, 7, 112-134.
Alalwan, N. (2022). Actual use of social media for engagement to enhance students’ learning. Education and Information Technologies (Dordrecht), 27, 9767–9789.
Amedie, J. (2015). The impact of social media on society. Pop Culture Intersections. Santa Clara University. [http://scholarcommons.scu.edu/engl_176/2]
Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 808–821.
Banet-Weiser, S. (2020). AuthenticTM. New York University Press. [https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814739372.001.0001]
Bird, S. E. (2011). Are we all produsers now?: Convergence and media audience practices. Cultural Studies, 25, 502–516.
Bishop, S. (2020). Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media and Society, 6, 88-103.
boyd, d. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social Media + Society, 1, 33-51.
Bucher, T. (2018). If...Then: Algorithmic power and politics. Routledge.
Buckingham, D. (2019). The media education manifesto. [www.davidbuckingham.net]
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Verso.
Danesi, M. (2019). Memes and the future of pop culture. Brill Research Perspectives in Popular Culture, 1, 1–81.
Diba, H., Vella, J. M., & Abratt, R. (2019). Social media influence on the B2B buying process. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 3, 1482–1496.
Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2018). Social media: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 419–423. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9848-5]
Evans, C. (2014). Twitter for teaching: Can social media be used to enhance the process of learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 902–915.
Flisfeder, M. (2021). Algorithmic desire: Toward a new structuralist theory of social media. Northwestern University Press.
Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 255–268.
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41, 6–30.
Gruzd, A., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Enabling community through social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e248.
Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. Routledge.
Huelsenbeck, R. (1920). En avant Dada: Jedna istorija Dadaizma. Brill.
Husain, S., Ghufran, A., & Chaubey, D. S. (n.d.). Relevance of social media in marketing and advertising. Splint International Journal of Professionals, 15, 21-57.
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2015). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Blackwell.
Jewitt, C., & Leder Mackley, K. (2019). Methodological dialogues across multimodality and sensory ethnography: Digital touch communication. Qualitative Research, 19, 90–110.
Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021). The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9, 229–253.
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 241–251.
Know Your Meme. (2023). Skibidi toilet. [https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/page/3]
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Verso.
Kucirkova, N. (2019). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. Journal of Children and Media, 13, 231–234.
Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Signed networks in social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1361–1370). [https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753532]
Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3, 65-81.
Manovich, L. (2017). Instagram and contemporary image. [http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/instagram-and-contemporary-image]
Markham, M. J., Gentile, D., & Graham, D. L. (2017). Social media for networking, professional development, and patient engagement. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 782–787. [https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_180077]
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439.
Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme. The MIT Press. [https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034999.001.0001]
Miller, D., et al. (2016). How the world changed social media. UCL Press. [https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634493]
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20, 4275–4292.
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.
Rachmad, Y. E. (2023). Social media impact theory. [https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/2dbnx]
Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2011). Influence and passivity in social media. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World Wide Web (pp. 113–114). [https://doi.org/10.1145/1963192.1963250]
Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. The MIT Press. [https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001]
Stollfuß, S. (2020). Communitainment on Instagram: Fitness content and community-driven communication as social media entertainment. SAGE Open, 10, 89-101.
Tucker, J., et al. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN Electronic Journal, 27, 39-45. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139]
Turner, V., & Abrahams, R. D. (2017). The ritual process. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134666]
Twenge, J. M., Haidt, J., Lozano, J., & Cummins, K. M. (2022). Specification curve analysis shows that social media use is linked to poor mental health, especially among girls. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103512.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001]
Voorveld, H. A. M., van Noort, G., Muntinga, D. G., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising, 47, 38–54.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.
Wayne, M. (2011). Personal connections in the digital age, by Baym, N. K. The Communication Review, 14, 149–151.
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader come home: The reading brain in a digital world. Penguin.
Zappavigna, M. (2016). Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication, 15, 271–292.
Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24, 1872–1890.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Zaki Dermawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.